Hannah Crowe represents plaintiffs in a variety of high-stakes matters and has delivered winning arguments in federal and state courts. Hannah devotes a substantial portion of her practice to seeking justice for people harmed during air travel. Her work in this area has been covered by CBS, ABC, The New York Post, and People.

Hannah is also a key member of the litigation team representing hospitals in their claims against pharmaceutical companies for the wrongful marketing, distribution, and dispensation of opioids across the country.

Among other critical successes, Hannah recently secured summary judgment for her client, a major electronic voting hardware and software company, in a commercial litigation case.

Hannah graduated from Harvard Law School, where she was an oralist and quarter finalist in the Ames Moot Court Competition, one of the most prestigious competitions for appellate brief writing and advocacy in the country. A native Texan, Hannah graduated summa cum laude from Rice University and was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa. Prior to law school, Hannah worked for the Boston Consulting Group.

Education

Harvard Law School, J.D.

Rice University, B.A., summa cum laude

Admissions & Honors

State Bar of Texas

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Representative Cases

• Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. et al v. Sackler et al (Broward Cty. Ct.) (opioids litigation)

• DCH Health Care Authority, et al v. Purdue, et al (Conecuh Cty. Ct.) (opioids litigation)

• Guida v. Gaia, Inc. (D. Colo.) (data privacy litigation)

• Fiorentino v. FloSports, Inc. (D. Mass.) (data privacy litigation) – achieved $2.6 million settlement on behalf of subscriber class

• Red, White, and Blue, Inc. Ltd. v. Dominion Voting Systems Corp. (Collin Cty. Ct.) (commercial litigation) – argued and won summary judgment on behalf of client; achieved favorable settlement shortly thereafter

• Altman et al v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. et al (D.N.J.) (antitrust litigation)

• Tavantzis v. American Airlines (N.D. Cal.) (catastrophic personal injury litigation)

• Old Pine Energy et al v. Burnett Petroleum Company (Jacinto Cty. Ct.) (commerical litigation)